WTB vs. HOD

Both the novels Heart of Darkness and Waiting for the Barbarians share a lot of similarities in both the main characters and the “western world’s” reaction towards “uncivilized” people. Both the main characters deal with a connection with an imperial empire that has operations dealing with barbarian tribes people. The setting for Darkness takes place in Africa, but Barbarians takes place in an unknown territory of a nameless empire. Both novels approach issues involving barbarism and what it is truly defines as. Both of the imperial powers in the novels view themselves and more civilized than the barbarians that they have power over, but in reality it is the western powers that inherently more less moral.

Both the narrators of the stories, Marlow for Darkness and the magistrate from Barbarians, view the western powers that they work for with a level of awareness absent in the other white people in the novels. The magistrate originally started off as a dutiful servant of the empire for many years, but eventually, enlightened himself to the wrongdoings surrounding his work. Both characters follow a path of truth and eventual form a new perspective on the actions of the western world. The pursuit of truth becomes a core value in each of the two characters.

Although one could argue that Kurtz also grew a connection with the uncivilized tribes in Africa, his intentions were brought on by “his own greed” (Kerr 23). Kurtz brought the worst the worst vices from imperial Europe and unleashed them on the tribes people. In Darkness, Marlow came to realize that Kurtz’s nature was actually more savage than the natives. Kurtz brought his avarice into Africa by creating conflicts between tribes so that he could obtain ivory. The magistrate in Barbarians grows closer to the tribes people as well but without a personal gain in mind.

The method that each of the author’s presents the depiction of savagery is also varying. Conrad uses a more subtle approach to convey the evil actions of the white men visiting Africa. Since colonization of Africa was still happening when the novel was written, a less explicit approach was deliberate and thoughtful. Coetzee exposes the white-man’s savagery in a much more graphic manner. This is due to its debut at a much later time. The evils of imperialism had already been exposed to the world and didn’t need to be expressed in a softer tone.